![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
In this week's Parade magazone, Marilyn vos Savant discussed how to replace "www" in normal conversation, since the three letters are a mouthful. The reader response she gave was to replace "www" with "web", so the pronunciation of www.google.com becomes web dot google dot com. Evidently she (or her assistant) didn't know that "web" could qualify as a subdomain (or not) and a user who types "web" instead of the intended "www" would be given the inncorrect (or non-existant) page. Anyone have a conversational alternative to "www"? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Anyone have a conversational alternative to "www"? |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
In this week's Parade magazone, Marilyn vos Savant discussed how to replace "www" in normal conversation, since the three letters are a mouthful. The reader response she gave was to replace "www" with "web", so the pronunciation of www.google.com becomes web dot google dot com. Evidently she (or her assistant) didn't know that "web" could qualify as a subdomain (or not) and a user who types "web" instead of the intended "www" would be given the inncorrect (or non-existant) page. Anyone have a conversational alternative to "www"? |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Anyone have a conversational alternative to "www"? |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Anyone have a conversational alternative to "www"? How about "triple w"? nope, don't go with triple w, how about w cubed ? |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 17:34:19 GMT, "Michael Wilcox" mjwilcoCANTHAVESPAM (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: In this week's Parade magazone, Marilyn vos Savant discussed how to replace "www" in normal conversation, since the three letters are a mouthful. The reader response she gave was to replace "www" with "web", so the pronunciation of www.google.com becomes web dot google dot com. Evidently she (or her assistant) didn't know that "web" could qualify as a subdomain (or not) and a user who types "web" instead of the intended "www" would be given the inncorrect (or non-existant) page. Anyone have a conversational alternative to "www"? How about "triple w"? |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 17:34:19 GMT, "Michael Wilcox" mjwilcoCANTHAVESPAM (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: In this week's Parade magazone, Marilyn vos Savant discussed how to replace "www" in normal conversation, since the three letters are a mouthful. The reader response she gave was to replace "www" with "web", so the pronunciation of www.google.com becomes web dot google dot com. Evidently she (or her assistant) didn't know that "web" could qualify as a subdomain (or not) and a user who types "web" instead of the intended "www" would be given the inncorrect (or non-existant) page. Anyone have a conversational alternative to "www"? How about "triple w"? Leslie |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
From: mjwilcoCANTHAVESPAM (AT) yahoo (DOT) com (Michael*Wilcox) Anyone have a conversational alternative to "www"? |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
From: mjwilcoCANTHAVESPAM (AT) yahoo (DOT) com (Michael*Wilcox) Anyone have a conversational alternative to "www"? What? No one thought of "w3" as in W3C... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |