Google, php and https

I have noticed that Google seems to have given a lower rank to the website
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com
since I began using the https protocol and php.
At the same time I have noticed that Google can index both because there are
some pages which have been indexed which are accessible over https and
have a php extension.
Does Google not like https and/or php?

--
Luigi ( un italiano che vive in Svezia)
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/

Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:

I have noticed that Google seems to have given a lower rank to the website
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com
since I began using the https protocol and php.
At the same time I have noticed that Google can index both because there
are
some pages which have been indexed which are accessible over https and
have a php extension.
Does Google not like https and/or php?

--
Luigi ( un italiano che vive in Svezia)
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/

alt.internet.search-engine would definitely provide you with an answer to
this question which is off-topic for alt.html. SEO and design are separate
in my opinion.

Roy

--
Roy S. Schestowitz
http://Schestowitz.com

"Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> skrev i meddelandet
news:d6aftr$c2m$1 (AT) godfrey (DOT) mcc.ac.uk...

Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:

I have noticed that Google seems to have given a lower rank to the
website
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com
since I began using the https protocol and php.
At the same time I have noticed that Google can index both because there
are
some pages which have been indexed which are accessible over https and
have a php extension.
Does Google not like https and/or php?

--
Luigi ( un italiano che vive in Svezia)
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/

alt.internet.search-engine would definitely provide you with an answer to
this question which is off-topic for alt.html. SEO and design are separate
in my opinion.

Roy

Thank you very much for your answer.
I posted it to the NG which you mentioned.


--
Luigi ( un italiano che vive in Svezia)
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/modem.html

While the city slept, Roy Schestowitz (newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com)
feverishly typed...

Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:

I have noticed that Google seems to have given a lower rank to the
website https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com
since I began using the https protocol and php.
[...]
alt.internet.search-engine would definitely provide you with an
answer to this question which is off-topic for alt.html. SEO and
design are separate in my opinion.

It is generally accepted in this group that "pretty much any web-related
discussion is on topic here", although it is agreed that some subjects may
receive more authoratitive replies in a specialised group. More info here:
http://www.html-faq.com/alt.html/?ontopic

While we are on the subject of how to post, it is usually appreciated if you
snip the OP's sig from your reply ;-)

Cheers,
Nige

--
Nigel Moss http://www.nigenet.org.uk
Mail address will bounce. nigel (AT) DOG (DOT) nigenet.org.uk | Take the DOG. out!
"Your mother ate my dog!", "Not all of him!"

nice.guy.nige wrote:

While the city slept, Roy Schestowitz (newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com)
feverishly typed...

Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:

I have noticed that Google seems to have given a lower rank to the
website https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com
since I began using the https protocol and php.
[...]
alt.internet.search-engine would definitely provide you with an
answer to this question which is off-topic for alt.html. SEO and
design are separate in my opinion.

It is generally accepted in this group that "pretty much any web-related
discussion is on topic here", although it is agreed that some subjects may
receive more authoratitive replies in a specialised group. More info here:
http://www.html-faq.com/alt.html/?ontopic

While we are on the subject of how to post, it is usually appreciated if you
snip the OP's sig from your reply ;-)

It would help if Luigi was using a valid sig; then a decent news client
would auto-snip it and it wouldn't have to be manually removed.

--
Blinky Linux Registered User 297263
Killing all Usenet posts from Google Groups
Info: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html

While the city slept, Blinky the Shark (no.spam (AT) box (DOT) invalid) feverishly
typed...

nice.guy.nige wrote:
While we are on the subject of how to post, it is usually
appreciated if you snip the OP's sig from your reply ;-)

It would help if Luigi was using a valid sig; then a decent news
client would auto-snip it and it wouldn't have to be manually removed.

Looks like a valid sig separator to me ("-- ") in Luigi's original post. And
Quotefix snipped the sig when I did a test "reply to group" on his OP.

Even so, I'm not sure manually deleting sigs is particularly hard work! Of
course, Roy could have simply forgotten to snip it. ;-)

Cheers,
Nige

--
Nigel Moss http://www.nigenet.org.uk
Mail address will bounce. nigel (AT) DOG (DOT) nigenet.org.uk | Take the DOG. out!
"Your mother ate my dog!", "Not all of him!"

Blinky the Shark wrote:

nice.guy.nige wrote:
While the city slept, Roy Schestowitz (newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com)
feverishly typed...

Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:

I have noticed that Google seems to have given a lower rank to the
website https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com
since I began using the https protocol and php.
[...]
alt.internet.search-engine would definitely provide you with an
answer to this question which is off-topic for alt.html. SEO and
design are separate in my opinion.

It is generally accepted in this group that "pretty much any web-related
discussion is on topic here", although it is agreed that some subjects
may receive more authoratitive replies in a specialised group. More info
here: http://www.html-faq.com/alt.html/?ontopic

While we are on the subject of how to post, it is usually appreciated if
you snip the OP's sig from your reply ;-)

It would help if Luigi was using a valid sig; then a decent news client
would auto-snip it and it wouldn't have to be manually removed.

I was just about to say that before glancing at Blinky's post.

Regarding on- and off-topic, I was perhaps exaggerating a bit. I was trying
to be helpful to Luigi and perhaps I was. Have a look at
alt.internet.search-engines and you will see that he gets dozens of useful
replies and a lively discussion takes place.

Roy

--
Roy S. Schestowitz
http://Schestowitz.com

While the city slept, Roy Schestowitz (newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com)
feverishly typed...

Regarding on- and off-topic, I was perhaps exaggerating a bit. I was
trying to be helpful to Luigi and perhaps I was.

You were right to suggest another group where they may be more generalised
expertise in the subject, and maybe a little overzealous with the
"off-topic" bit? ;-) But definately useful to the OP to point him to the
group you suggested as you mention below.

Have a look at
alt.internet.search-engines and you will see that he gets dozens of
useful replies and a lively discussion takes place.

This is fairly lively... :-)

Cheers,
Nige

--
Nigel Moss http://www.nigenet.org.uk
Mail address will bounce. nigel (AT) DOG (DOT) nigenet.org.uk | Take the DOG. out!
"Your mother ate my dog!", "Not all of him!"

nice.guy.nige wrote:

While the city slept, Blinky the Shark (no.spam (AT) box (DOT) invalid) feverishly
typed...

nice.guy.nige wrote:
While we are on the subject of how to post, it is usually
appreciated if you snip the OP's sig from your reply ;-)

It would help if Luigi was using a valid sig; then a decent news
client would auto-snip it and it wouldn't have to be manually removed.

Looks like a valid sig separator to me ("-- ") in Luigi's original post. And
Quotefix snipped the sig when I did a test "reply to group" on his OP.

The one in question is lacking the space after the two hyphens.

--
Blinky Linux Registered User 297263
Killing all Usenet posts from Google Groups
Info: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html