![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||||
| |||||
|
|
Hoping to use above in a website |
|
-looks really good in explorer |
|
and opera but in my beloved Mozilla Firefox the lines don't meet correctly - anyone know any coding i can use to sort? |
|
would be really good if it would round corners a la IE. |
| www.turnersmill.co.uk is my test page |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
highway of diamonds <one (AT) oneandonly (DOT) com> wrote: Hoping to use above in a website You mean fieldset and legend? (Never refer to the Subject line in the message body. Just repeat what needs to be repeated.) You use them by the specification, right? -looks really good in explorer You mean Internet Explorer, not Explorer, right? and opera but in my beloved Mozilla Firefox the lines don't meet correctly - anyone know any coding i can use to sort? What do you mean by lines meeting, and what is your definition of "correctly"? There is no definition of how fieldset and legend should be rendered. If you mean the spacing inside a fieldset, it can - with the usual caveats - be affected by setting padding properties for the fieldset element, using CSS. would be really good if it would round corners a la IE. IE does not round corners except in a few versions of Windows. www.turnersmill.co.uk is my test page You're abusing fieldset there. The fieldset element, by definition, as the name suggests, specifies a collection of form fields. You are apparently using it for its assumed visual rendering only, and now you're complaining that it does not give the desired visual rendering. In fact, on my computer, the appearance is less readable on IE than on Mozilla. Use <h2>, <div>, and CSS instead. Hey thanks for the reply its was more or less helpful. However, abuse |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hey thanks for the reply its was more or less helpful. |
|
However, abuse is rather a hard word - |
|
do you ever reply to anyone with less html knowledge than yourself without being condescending. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
highway of diamonds <one (AT) oneandonly (DOT) com> wrote: Hey thanks for the reply its was more or less helpful. Apparently you did not read it comprehensively, though - fullquoting is the usual way of signalling lack of comprehensive reading on Usenet. However, abuse is rather a hard word - "Make wrong use of something", says a dictionary. Using an element of a formal language against its specification is wrong, by definition. do you ever reply to anyone with less html knowledge than yourself without being condescending. Now here's a hard word for you: You insult me, and much worse, you are a coward who does not even do it under her or his own name. Consider yourself plonked, and consider my planned further help for you (consisting of a style sheet design for simulating <fieldset appearance) canceled. HTH. HAND. Well read in web techniques and NG etiquette you may think you are -but |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |